-
|
-
|
-
| www.flickr.com |
|
The big platform debate |
| by Neil Middleton 6:25 pm Friday, 24 August 2007. |
As you are probably aware there is a choice now for CFML developers (CFMX for Java, Bluedragon for .NET). But, for now I’m not interested in CFML, I want to hear from people about the underlying platforms.
Therefore, if you are a Java or .NET fan - why should I choose your platform over the other for day-to-day web development?
The things I want to hear most about are:
…and finally…
Tell me what you think…
Comments (0)|
|
The second craziest use of technology I have seen… |
| by Neil Middleton 1:43 pm Wednesday, 22 August 2007. |
A couple of weeks ago I posted about a really clever use of Flickr.
Well, I come across something even more impressive. As described on the site:
“Revealed SIGGRAPH this new method of image resizing looks for seams (not simple columns or rows) of pixels with the ‘least energy’ (least contrast / change in detail) both vertically and horizontally in the image and then uses this to enable resizing without losing important image content such as human subjects or other detail. This technique can be used for reducing and enlarging images as well as removing items from the image which are not wanted (by manually painting ‘negative weight’ over an area of the image).”
Comments (0)|
|
Looking to pick up some .NET skills? |
| by Neil Middleton 10:18 pm Tuesday, 21 August 2007. |
If like me, you are a CFML developer and looking to pick up additional skills (namely .NET) you might be interested to know that there are three webcasts on Microsoft.com that you can watch explicitly targetted at yourselves.
Personally, I have only had time to watch a couple, but if you would like a quick primer in ASP.NET and how it directly relates to CFML, check them out. Even if you have no interest in .NET, it’s always good to be aware. If you are Bluedragon.NET user, then these are definitely worth a look.
I love things like this - they help me with my target of learning a new language every year.
Comments (0)|
|
Bubbles! The Bubbles! |
| by Neil Middleton 8:57 pm Thursday, 16 August 2007. |
In case you’ve been hidden under a rock for the last few months you’ll have noticed that there is a bit of a change coming about in how information is presented on the web. This is the move to the Rich Internet Applications (RIA’s) and their respective display technologies.
It is these technologies that I have spent a little bit of time looking at recently, and I thought I would share those thoughts with you just to see what other people thought.
At the moment, there are four significant competitors for the RIA market. Adobe’s Flex, Microsoft’s Silverlight, good old’ DHTML and Sun’s JavaFX. Generally speaking, all these technologies are able to bring to the browser more than that of traditional HTML either via sprinkling’s of Javascript (DHTML) or a browser plugin (Flex, Silverlight and Java FX). So what are they all like? Well, I’ve had a little play with all these things and think the following of them:
Adobe’s Flex has been out for a while now and is headed towards version 3 as we speak. I’m not going to state the obvious here as to the capabilities of the system, as any old monkey can get that information from any Google search. I’m merely here to tell you what I think. Flex is an interesting if slightly restricted model. It runs in the Flash platform, which makes it nice and umbiqutous out of the box, and the SDK is also free, which means you can develop Flex apps freely. It’s also open-source to a certain extent which may float your boat.
The reason I see Flex as restricted is down to the Flash Player. Being a browser plugin it is constrained by browser security, and can therefore only accomplish certain things. Yes, it is very big capabilities with animation, but I feel it might be somewhat limited on the more complicated stuff. The worst thing Adobe could do here is rest on their laurels and think that because they have the most common piece of the software on the planet under their control they don’t have a problem - but they do in the shape of the other tools mentioned here.
There is also the open source aspect to Flex. At the moment, I beleive this only relates to the components that are used within the compiled swf’s, and not the core compiler itself - which very much limits what contributions and changes people can make to the tool.
At this point I should probably mention AIR, the Adobe Integrated Runtime, which let’s you run Flex (and HTML) apps in a desktop context, thus being able to access local disk and even use a small client db server. However, for me, I can’t really see this taking off in the way that Adobe intend. For instance, most of the users that I meet are working on corporate networks, and cannot install new software themselves, when they can quite happily install browser plugins. For me this is a massive problem. Firstly, why would my user want to have to download an app to use another app, and secondly, why should I force my users to have to install something (which just makes their lives harder)? Everyone I know just wants to get stuff done.
Silverlight is an interesting one for me. At first it appears to be direct competitor to Flash/Flex, but upon looking into it there are substantial and very interesting differences. The main one that I am aware of, is that Silverlight contains the .NET framework and the CLR, which, if you aren’t aware, is a lot of code that can do a lot of things. While developing Silverlight, MS took the .NET framework and took out everything that wasn’t needed in the development of RIAs, then they shrunk it a bit more. This meant they were able to get everything you might need into a small download.
Now, if you think about this also from a resourcing point of view, this is very interesting. Now I can teach a guy C#, and he can go away and work on my data tier with SQL 2005. The same guy can they go and work (with the same skills and tools) on my business tier. Once done, he can also work on the presentation tier (Silverlight and ASP.NET). This is a very compelling scenario and it makes a development team incredibly flexible. One set of skills for all scenarios.
Incidentally there is no reason why you couldn’t write your silverlight apps in Ruby by using the DLR.
Another small thing to note is performance. .NET is fast, and this carries through to the Silverlight player. Also note, that cross-platform coverage is also kind of limited to Windows and OSX, although the mono project has built a *NIX based version of Silverlight - Moonlight.
DHTML is the old kid on the block. By using traditional DOM manipulation, developers can acheive a lot. However, they also expose themselves to untold problems with browser compatability, performance issues to take into account, plus an overall limitation on what is possible. However, nothing requires installation, it works for everyone (that the developers have built their app for).
JavaFX is another stab at Applets from what I can see. Sun trying to create a small downloadable JVM that can run in browser in a similar vein to Silverlight. However, the current version is so slow, and painstaking to load, that I am going to barely consider it here until a much improved version is released..
So, as you can see, there’s quite a choice. But, why the title? What’s this got to do with bubbles? Well, the thing that kicked this off for me was visiting bubblemark.com. Bubblemark.com is a performance benchmarking piece of software that measures the performance of these various technologies in your browser. I ran through the tests and got some interesting results:
Now, I don’t know about you, but these results are stunning for Silverlight, and fairly dismal for JavaFX. It’s also interesting that Silverlight (Javascript) and Flex are the same speed considering that one is interpreted and the other compiled. Now bear in mind, that I only ran these test on my machine a couple of times, your mileage may vary (and please let me know if they do).
So, after all this, it’s easy to see that there is a gamut of options. For me, Silverlight looks to be the most promising overall, but as it hasn’t yet hit a final release it’s hard to fully judge. In the interim, Flex has to the RIA platform of choice due to lack of a capable competitor in the market.
If you have any differing thoughts, please let me know.
|
|
The craziest use of technology I have seen this week is…. |
| by Neil Middleton 10:49 pm Friday, 10 August 2007. |
Scene completion using millions of Photographs
“We present a new image completion algorithm powered by a huge database of photographs gathered from the Web. The algorithm patches up holes in images by finding similar image regions in the database that are not only seamless but also semantically valid. Our chief insight is that while the space of images is effectively infinite, the space of semantically differentiable scenes is actually not that large. For many image completion tasks we are able to find similar scenes which contain image fragments that will convincingly complete the image. Our algorithm is entirely data-driven, requiring no annotations or labelling by the user. “
Comments (0)